Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/9350
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.advisorDa Fonte Carvalho, Marcella-
dc.creatorRomán Melo, Álvaro Sebastián-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-23T00:48:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-23T00:48:01Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationRomán Melo, Á. S. (2018). La cosa juzgada fraudulenta y el derecho a la verdad que tiene la víctima. (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad de las Américas, Quito.es_ES
dc.identifier.otherUDLA-EC-TAB-2018-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/9350-
dc.descriptionIn the present work emphasis has been made, firstly, on giving a legal, doctrinal and, if possible personal, conceptualization of what res judicata means; in a second moment, the elements of the res judicata are analyzed and how, due to the non-observance of some of them, there are errors in judgments that are already final and res judicata, which leads to fraudulent res judicata, which is not contemplated in the Ecuadorian legislation. However, there are precedents in our country (Ecuador) regarding the reopening of a case because the fraudulent res judicata has been configured. Subsequently, the term “victim” is analyzed; the rights they have as such; and, the criminal procedural guarantees as instruments that make viable their After a relationship is made between the right to truth and fraudulent res judicata, which triggers the analysis of the process called “Gonzales and others” also known as “Fybeca”, for being the first case in our country in which the principles of due process, legal security and consequently the right to the truth of the victims were affected. In the same way in the present work, a dogmatic and jurisprudential analysis of the case “Gonzales and others” is carried out to finalize in the conclusions that were reached after having investigated the main theme of this essay.en
dc.description.abstractEn el presente trabajo se ha hecho énfasis, primeramente, en dar una conceptualización legal, doctrinaria y si cabe personal, de qué significa la cosa juzgada; en un segundo momento, se analizan los elementos de la cosa juzgada y cómo por la inobservancia de alguno de ellos, se producen errores en las sentencias ya firmes con carácter de cosa juzgada, lo que ocasiona la cosa juzgada fraudulenta, la misma que no está contemplada en la legislación ecuatoriana...es_ES
dc.format.extent52 p.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherQuito: Universidad de las Américas, 2018es_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/*
dc.subjectCOSA JUZGADA ÍRRITAes_ES
dc.subjectDERECHOS DE LA VÍCTIMAes_ES
dc.subjectGARANTÍAS PROCESALESes_ES
dc.subjectSENTENCIA FIRMEes_ES
dc.titleLa cosa juzgada fraudulenta y el derecho a la verdad que tiene la víctimaes_ES
dc.typebachelorThesises_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Derecho

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
UDLA-EC-TAB-2018-01.pdf920,94 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons