Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/91
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.advisorPáez Benalcázar, Álvaro Santiago-
dc.creatorRivadeneyra Villacrés, María José-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-12T23:03:45Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-12T23:03:45Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationRivadeneyra Villacrés, M. J. (2013). Las compras de renuncias obligatorias originadas por la reforma al reglamento de la ley orgánica del servicio público, aprobadas mediante decreto ejecutivo 813 del año 2011 y sus efectos en la comunidad nacional (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad de las Américas, Quito.es_ES
dc.identifier.otherUDLA-EC-TAB-2013-72-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/91-
dc.descriptionIn this paper we analyze the concept of "mandatory waiver" contained in Article 8 of Executive Decree 813, published in Official Gazette Supplement No. 489, dated July 12, 2011, and its effects on staff untying several belonging to state institutions: Ministry of Public Health, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Urban Development and Housing, other. What provoked an immediate reaction from the unions, Provincial Federation of Public Servants of Pichincha (FENASEP) and the National Confederation of Public Servants (CONASEP) who presented to the Constitutional Court the constitutional claim. The many sources of information that exist on this subject, being of national and international knowledge, allowed to meet the Kyoto targets, eg, letter k) of Article 47 of the LOSEP, establishes the existence of waivers purchases with compensation, but not "mandatory". While many jurists, like Julius Caesar Trujillo, assert that the waiver is legally recognized provided that such waiver is freely consented by resigning, but when it is required, it is a wrongful dismissal. The research also includes a summary of the process used by the victims of Decree 813 with the Constitutional Court claiming it unconstitutional, as well as the drafting of the judgment on the demand made by Judge Roberto Bhrunis, through which, the full Court is declared competent to review the issue, considering that it is the duty of the Administrative Court. The study leads to the conclusion that "compulsory purchases waivers" do not exist in Ecuadorian law, reason, Art 8 of Executive Decree 813, published in Official Gazette Supplement No. 489 of July 12, 2011, is an act unconstitutional because it violates article 66 paragraph 29, letter d) of the Constitution, which provides that no person may be compelled to do something forbidden or stop doing something not prohibited by law, a fact that generates an image refusal of our country with the national and international community.en
dc.description.abstractEn el presente trabajo se analiza la figura de la “renuncia obligatoria” consignada en el Art. 8 del Decreto Ejecutivo 813, publicado en el Registro Oficial Suplemento Nº 489, del 12 de julio de 2011, y sus efectos en la desvinculación del personal de varias instituciones del Estado pertenecientes al: Ministerio de Salud Pública, Ministerio del Interior, Ministerio de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda, otras...es_ES
dc.format.extent65 p.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherQuito: Universidad de las Américas, 2013es_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/es_ES
dc.subjectEFECTO JURÍDICOes_ES
dc.subjectLEY ORGÁNICAes_ES
dc.subjectDERECHO EJECUTIVOes_ES
dc.subjectDERECHOS HUMANOSes_ES
dc.titleLas compras de renuncias obligatorias originadas por la reforma al reglamento de la ley orgánica del servicio público, aprobadas mediante decreto ejecutivo 813 del año 2011 y sus efectos en la comunidad nacionales_ES
dc.typebachelorThesises_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Derecho

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
UDLA-EC-TAB-2013-72.pdfTESIS A TEXTO COMPLETO589,55 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons