Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/13072
Tipo de material : bachelorThesis
Título : Los principios constitucionales de los estados de excepción y el control material de constitucionalidad del decreto 884 – 2019
Autor : Camacho Zambrano, Lisette Estefanía
Tutor : Morales Naranjo, Viviana Lizeth
Palabras clave : DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL;DERECHOS Y GARANTÍAS CONSTITUCIONALES
Fecha de publicación : 2020
Editorial : Quito: Universidad de las Américas, 2020
Citación : Camacho, L. (2020). Los principios constitucionales de los estados de excepción y el control material de constitucionalidad del decreto 884 – 2019 (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad de las Américas, Quito.
Resumen : El 1 de octubre de 2019, el gobierno ecuatoriano aprobó el Decreto número 883, por medio del cual se adoptaron un conjunto de medidas económicas cuya implementación incidía en forma negativa en ciertos sectores de la sociedad ecuatoriana...
Descripción : On October 1, 2019, the Ecuadorian government approved Decree No. 883, through which a set of economic measures were adopted whose implementation had a negative impact on certain sectors of Ecuadorian society. In response to this public decision, a series of social mobilizations took place, mainly in Quito, made up of indigenous groups, transporters, unions and the general public in order to show the rejection of said decree. In view of the aforementioned acts, the government subsequently issued Decree No. 884 declaring a state of exception throughout the Ecuadorian territory and taking a series of provisions aimed at suppressing any act of social claim. Subsequently, the Constitutional Court carried out the constitutionality control on said state of exception, determining its constitutionality. Based on the above, this investigation aims, on the one hand, to demonstrate that Decree 884 violated several constitutional rights of the protesters (the right to freedom of association and assembly, to protest, to resistance, among others) and to certain principles that support a state of exception (necessity, proportionality, territoriality and reasonableness); and, on the other hand, that the material control carried out by the Constitutional Court regarding the declaration of a state of exception and the measures ordered was deficient and impeded the effective participation of citizens in matters of public interest and their right to oppose any measure that they consider contrary to the general interest.
URI : http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/13072
Aparece en las colecciones: Derecho

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
UDLA-EC-TAB-2020-18.pdf904,29 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons